The New Woody Allen Documentary Is A Nuanced Reckoning
Woody Allen’s 1992 break up from actor Mia Farrow — and his romantic relationship along with her then-21-year-old adopted daughter, Quickly-Yi Previn — grew to become a type of monocultural ’90s scandals that the general public consumed by means of tabloid osmosis.
The saga performed out in blaring headlines on the covers of New York each day papers, in nightly newscasts, and on discuss exhibits. The sexual abuse allegations that then-7-year-old Dylan Farrow made in opposition to Allen weren’t the primary story; they have been a subplot within the contentious breakup narrative.
Folks break up into Crew Allen or Crew Farrow, treating the story like a “he said, she said” movie star match. Mia — the scorned lady — had “coached” Dylan into making her allegations, Allen claimed, in an effort to assault him.
By 2014, after an grownup Dylan renewed her allegations against Allen, the media barely paid consideration. (The New York Occasions selected to publish her essay in columnist Nicholas Kristof’s weblog somewhat than as a narrative within the precise paper.) Journalist Ronan Farrow (Dylan’s sibling) tweeted about her claims against Allen during a Golden Globes tribute that year, setting off one thing of a social media reckoning. Nevertheless it wasn’t till #MeToo that precise penalties began happening; some actors refused to work with him, and others later expressed regret at having completed so. In 2018, Amazon canceled its contract with Allen.
Allen v. Farrow, the brand new, multi-part HBO documentary by Amy Ziering and Kirby Dick dropping Sunday, joins quite a lot of current sequence critically revisiting the best way ’90s media and the court docket system handled claims of sexual abuse. (Allen declined to take part within the sequence, and he denies any allegations of sexual abuse. On Sunday, Allen and Quickly-Yi Previn launched an announcement calling the series a “hatchet job riddled with falsehoods.”). It’s a reclamation of the tales from Mia and Dylan, an examination of the court docket instances in opposition to Allen, and a reckoning with the gendered biases of the judiciary and media. This documentary, like different current ones, doesn’t contextualize race in its critique of gender politics. Nonetheless, Allen v. Farrow is a nuanced instance of what the revived style can do.
The Allen/Farrow story is advanced partly as a result of it’s many tales in a single: a celeb tabloid story, a private melodrama, and a cultural morality play. The sequence’ 4 episodes successfully weave all these strands right into a coherent indictment of Allen and the ability he wielded.
The sequence reminds us of how Allen the writer-director-actor grew to become a serious New York movie star, embodying the spirit of the town, by means of movies like Manhattan and Annie Corridor. It gives background on his fascination with teen women, together with interviews with a model he had a sexual relationship with when she was 16 and who impressed Mariel Hemingway’s function in Manhattan, the place she performs a highschool senior courting Allen’s 42-year-old character.
The documentary additionally covers Mia and Allen’s unconventional relationship and household (they by no means lived collectively or married), the delivery of Satchel (now Ronan), and Mia’s adoption of Dylan and Moses Farrow within the ’80s.
Utilizing intimate residence movies and testimonies from household buddies and family workers, Allen v. Farrow contextualizes the more and more creepy curiosity that Allen took in Dylan. Babysitters and buddies observed his persistent consideration to her (“Dylan was staring off into space, and Woody was in her lap,” one babysitter recollects); even a baby psychiatrist within the constructing the place the Farrows lived identified to Mia that his interactions with Dylan appeared inappropriate.
By 1991, Allen began counseling for his conduct with Dylan. It’s particularly useful to listen to Farrow’s aspect, as a result of it’s partly the story of a girl discovering it arduous to come back to phrases with the reality a couple of companion she cherished. (In probably the most poignant scenes within the documentary, Mia apologizes to Dylan and asks if she’s indignant at her for not seeing every part. No, Dylan replies, she’s grateful that she believed her.)
Mia was in her thirties, working as an actor in Allen’s motion pictures, and the steadiness of energy was very a lot on his aspect. Mia (and good friend Carly Simon) level out how Allen chipped away at her shallowness, weaponizing her age in opposition to her to remind her of her diminished worth within the trade.
In January 1992, Mia discovered nude photos Allen took of Previn in his residence, and even then she was confused about what to do. When she confirmed the images to Allen’s therapist, Mia claims, he stared at them lasciviously and proclaimed, “It’s not a therapist’s job to moralize.” In phone calls she taped between her and Allen, she sounds eager for a reconciliation.
It was in August, throughout one among Allen’s visits with Dylan, that he went lacking for 20 minutes along with her. Dylan claims he had taken her as much as an attic and sexually assaulted her in a means that went past his ordinary infringement of her boundaries. “Do not move,” she says he informed her. “I have to do this. If you stay still, then we can go to Paris.”
Lastly, Mia taped Dylan’s recountings of what occurred and contacted authorities. When Dylan’s allegations have been about to leak, Allen went public along with his affair with Previn, claiming they have been in love. That chronology — of the connection with Previn leaking earlier than the sexual assault allegations — is what purposely turned the protection right into a tabloid affair story. “WOODY LOVES MIA’S DAUGHTER,” blared the papers. And from then on, Allen’s group of publicists and legal professionals owned the narrative.
The sequence doesn’t simply present the private tales behind the headlines, but it surely additionally reexamines the court docket instances in opposition to Allen — in Connecticut, the place Farrow had a residence, and in New York — and the way he offered them within the media.
A Yale New Haven Hospital investigation, ordered by the prosecutor, obtained hijacked by Allen. He staged a press convention to announce he’d been acquitted after by some means getting the stories, which stated Dylan sounded rehearsed, earlier than the lawyer.
In actual fact, in keeping with the movie, social staff had interviewed Dylan 9 occasions, which went in opposition to regular working process for youngster sexual abuse even on the time. As she recollects: If she had been constant in her story, they’d say she was “coached,” and if she had made adjustments, they’d say she was “inconsistent.” Allen, for his half, refused a polygraph. The Connecticut prosecutor believed there was possible trigger however selected to not pursue it in order to not retraumatize Dylan. In New York, a social employee who interviewed Dylan stated he believed her and was fired. (Reportedly, youngster welfare authorities confronted strain from then-mayor David Dinkins to wrap up the case.)
Through the custody case in New York, Allen’s legal professionals launched the idea of “parental alienation” — coined with none precise proof — about girls weaponizing sexual assault allegations in opposition to their husbands in custody instances. Allen had highly effective publicists and legal professionals parroting his speaking factors.
Even with the media stacked on Allen’s aspect, the custody choose dominated in opposition to him and questioned whether or not he ought to ever be allowed visitation rights once more. (Dylan herself selected by no means to see him once more.) But, till the case’s resurgence through the #MeToo motion, the general public had seen Mia as an indignant ex-partner, and Dylan as a “coached” youngster.
As this new wave of docu-series makes an attempt to revisit tabloid moralizing and critique the best way the media frames tales of girls celebrities, they will’t assist however reproduce a number of the identical issues with ’90s and aughts media cultures. It’s not an accident, as an example, that it took the Framing Britney Spears documentary to get Justin Timberlake to apologize to Janet Jackson.
And in making its case in opposition to Allen and depicting Dylan and Mia’s perspective, Allen v. Farrow lacks nuance within the illustration of Moses. In a 2018 weblog submit, Moses, who’s now a therapist, claimed that Mia had emotionally and physically abused him. His account evokes most of the stories of celebrities’ adoptive children, particularly tales of transracial adoptions.
Within the docuseries, the white siblings low cost and dismiss Moses’s claims of abuse and ableism. (Farrow herself has additionally denied the allegations.) In some methods, the docuseries’ stance is comprehensible as a result of it has to take care of (and convincingly falsifies) Moses’s protection of his father concerning Dylan. However many issues might be true directly.
The best way the documentary flattens Moses’s claims about his personal trauma by recasting it as a part of the household’s rupture over Dylan’s story — and the battle between Allen and Mia — is emblematic of the ’90s media: Race remains to be seen as secondary to gender, notably concerning whose innocence deserves safety.
Nonetheless, Allen v. Farrow is an overdue reckoning with Mia and Dylan’s story and the mores of a whole cultural second. Just like the Michael Jackson documentary Leaving Neverland, which starkly positioned his survivors’ views within the foreground, it forces us to confront uncomfortable truths. Because it connects the dots, methodically and gruesomely, you’ll by no means see Allen the identical means once more.●